Sunak’s Ploy Pretending to be Pro-House Affordability fails

1 min read
September 14, 2023
black light post near tree
Photo by Timea Kadar on

Why it matters: Rishi Sunak’s plan to revise environmental regulations to spur housebuilding met strong resistance in the House of Lords. The move faced a significant backlash from environmental groups, underlining the political tightrope governments walk when tackling housing and environmental concerns.

The details:

  • The Conservative government aimed to ease the EU-inherited “nutrient neutrality” regulations. These rules, which prevent builders from developing in certain areas or require them to mitigate their impact, were targeted to facilitate the construction of 100,000 additional homes by 2030.
  • But that strategy hit a wall on Wednesday when the House of Lords voted it down 192 to 161. Given parliamentary protocols, the House of Commons can’t reverse the decision, placing the policy in indefinite limbo.

What they’re saying:

  • Sunak criticized Labour Party leader Keir Starmer for fluctuating support and opposition to housing initiatives (despite the Tories and Sunak doing the same over the decade in power, housing prices show it). This was after the Labour Party voiced its intent to vote down the measure.
  • As the current Parliament session nears its conclusion, the government’s eleventh-hour push to amend the bill suggests possible strategic positioning. This could be a play by the Tories to paint Labour as prioritizing environmental concerns over housing needs.
  • Starmer’s representative argued that the Conservative’s proposals were “hasty and flawed”, with serious concerns about the environmental repercussions on waterways and ecosystems.

The bigger picture:

  • Sunak’s challenges lie in increasing housing construction to meet the surging demand ahead of the 2024 general elections and navigating the political minefields that accompany environmental debates.
  • While developers supported the government’s proposed pollution guideline amendments, environmental factions warned against the potential trade-offs.
  • The Tories are scrutinized for not upholding their pledge to construct 300,000 homes annually, despite it not surprising to anyone considering the Tories prioritize home values over affordability. They’re also facing criticism over sewage discharges into water bodies, making any relaxation in environmental standards a controversial move.

What’s next: The government might consider introducing legislation in the next Parliament session, which kicks off on November 7, to find a way around this impasse. On the other hand, Labour has called for a consultation in the coming three months to consider alternative reforms for water pollution controls.

Previous Story

“Yes In God’s Backyard” bill (SB4) passed in California’s Senate

Next Story

Australia’s $10 Billion Housing Fund (HAFF) Gains Parliamentary Approval

Discover more from Stop Population Decline

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue Reading

Don't Miss

Putin’s Cruel War Pillages the Future: The Falling Birth Rates of Ukraine and Russia

While Putin’s war continues to ravage Ukraine and consume Russia,

Gov. Newsom signed Anti “People are Pollution” Bill (AB 1307)

UC Berkeley’s contentious plan to construct student housing at the